Conversations spike after CDC announces study of debunked autism-vaccine link

This week, the measles outbreak in the South Central and Southwestern U.S. continued to fuel false claims while online posts discussed new bills and lawsuits targeting childhood and mRNA vaccines.

Conversations spike after CDC announces study of debunked autism-vaccine link

This week, the measles outbreak in the South Central and Southwestern U.S. continued to fuel false claims while online posts discussed new bills and lawsuits targeting childhood and mRNA vaccines.

This week, CDC sources confirmed reports that the agency plans to launch a large-scale study into the myth that vaccines cause autism despite decades of research disproving any link. The reports caused concern online that federal health agencies may sow public doubt about the importance and safety of vaccines as state-level legislation and lawsuits target mRNA vaccines and school vaccine requirements. Meanwhile, as the measles outbreak affecting Southwestern states spread to Oklahoma, vaccine opponents promoted false claims about the safety and importance of measles vaccination.


Insights brought to you by the reporters and science writers of Public Good News (PGN), a nonprofit newsroom dedicated to improving community health.

On March 8, an HHS spokesperson confirmed reports that the CDC will investigate whether vaccines cause autism, a link that has been thoroughly researched and disproven over the last three decades. The spokespeople stated that the “CDC will leave no stone unturned.” Online, many experts and critics highlighted the many large-scale studies showing there is no link between autism and childhood vaccines, calling the new study a “waste of time and money.” Some speculated that the study would be conducted by anti-vaccine and non-CDC researchers, while others claimed without evidence that research proving the link has been “suppressed.” Vaccine skeptics showed their support for the new study by repeating debunked myths about vaccine safety, including falsely claiming that vaccine adjuvants cause autism and other developmental disorders.

False claims and conspiracy theories about measles continued to circulate online this week as the measles outbreak in the Southwest spread to a third state. Many conversations focused on vitamin A as a vaccine alternative, a response to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy’s promotion of the vitamin to treat measles. Vaccine opponents suggested vaccination is unnecessary because improved sanitation and hygiene are responsible for declining measles rates and advocated for natural immunity instead of vaccination. Posts repeated the myth that MMR vaccines cause autism, claimed without evidence that the vaccine has caused far more deaths than measles, and speculated that the measles outbreak is a ploy to introduce a combination measles-COVID-19 vaccine. Florida’s surgeon general appeared to downplay the importance of vaccination, describing it as an “option” for parents who want it and repeating Kennedy’s recommendation to use vitamin A as a measles treatment.  

Social media users in several U.S. states are discussing controversial legislation and court decisions related to vaccines. Iowa voted to advance a bill banning a vaccine from being distributed, sold, or administered unless the manufacturer waives legal immunity. Critics argue that the bill would undermine the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, discourage health care providers from practicing in the state, and cause residents to lose access to routine vaccines. Supporters claimed that vaccines are dangerous and advocated for a similar national law. Vaccine opponents expressed disappointment over two lawsuits in Maine and New York. The Maine case ruled that parents cannot sue medical providers for vaccinating a child without parental consent unless there is evidence of willful misconduct, while the New York case ruled that Amish children must comply with the state’s vaccination requirements to enroll in school. The decisions are being criticized as “blows to religious freedom and parental rights.” Finally, several states are attempting to ban mRNA vaccines, a move lauded by vaccine opponents.

Read the fact checks: 



Recommendations brought to you by the health communication experts behind Infodemiology.com.

Each week the Infodemiology.com team will provide talking points and supporting messages in response to some of the trending narratives outlined above. Health care providers can use this messaging when discussing vaccines online, talking to patients, or engaging with communities.

Vaccines don’t cause autism. There is no debate about this topic among experts, who know that decades of research have thoroughly disproved the myth.

  • In the 1990s, a doctor published a study claiming that vaccines cause autism. The study has since been retracted, and the doctor was discredited and stripped of his medical license for conducting unethical experiments on children.
  • Researchers have conducted many studies over the last three decades searching for evidence linking vaccines to autism. There is none.
  • We have ample evidence that vaccines don’t cause autism. Experts warn that new research ordered by Kennedy, who as recently as 2023 promoted the debunked link between autism and vaccines, is a waste of time and resources.

Vaccination is the only way to prevent measles. Unvaccinated children are at high risk during an outbreak.

  • Vaccination is the best protection against measles, providing 97 percent effectiveness against infection. Only five of the 223 cases reported in the Texas outbreak were among the vaccinated.
  • Vitamins and supplements do not prevent measles and are not a substitute for vaccination.
  • The MMR vaccine is very safe. It has been given to millions of children since 1971, with no evidence of safety concerns.
  • While improved sanitation and hygiene may help reduce the spread of measles, they are not enough to prevent outbreaks. This is evident from the fact that measles outbreaks occur not only in places with poor sanitation; they occur in places with low vaccination rates.

All vaccines undergo many rounds of safety testing before approval and are monitored for safety throughout their use.

  • Claims that certain approved vaccines should be banned or restricted because they are unsafe are misleading and misunderstand how we know vaccines are safe.
  • Before vaccines can be approved, they must undergo studies in animals and humans to ensure their safety. Experts review all safety data before deciding whether a vaccine is safe. 
  • After approval, federal health authorities and independent researchers worldwide rigorously monitor all aspects of vaccine safety and alert the public if any safety issues arise. 
  • These systems work in conjunction to detect even extremely rare vaccine safety concerns.


Interested in recommendations tailored to public health professionals? Click here.